Category Archives: risk tolerance

How to Hang Tough in a Tough Market

These are tough times to be an investor. The stock market’s long-term return of 11-13% fades in relevance as the value of your portfolio declines. Investors begin to doubt their decision to invest in this wild, volatile, crazy, anxiety-creating market. I’m not writing this article to say you shouldn’t feel that way. I’m writing to suggest you grasp the lessons an ugly market teaches us, and evaluate whether you have the correct plan for your portfolio.

Striking the Right Balance

The most important decision an investor makes is the allocation of their money between stocks, bonds, and cash. Some research has shown that 90% of your long-term return comes from this asset allocation decision. Many, maybe most, people jump right into buying stocks and mutual funds before they have crafted their stock/bond/cash strategy. They end up with too much in the stock market, making them susceptible to larger losses than they can tolerate.

The stock market over the long term has provided higher returns than bonds because investors demand a premium for accepting the higher risk in stocks.  Why do stocks pose more risk to investors? The brief answer is when you buy shares of a company, you become part-owner in the firm. There are no guarantees of dividends or that you will ever get your money back. If you buy a bond issued by the government or a corporation, you become a creditor. You have lent them money. They in turn will pay you interest over the life of the bond. Upon maturity you get your principal back. Regular payments and your money back. Not much risk in that. Oh, if a company you lent money to goes broke, you get paid before stockholders get a dime. Common stockholders get paid if there’s any money left after bond holders and preferred stock holders are satisfied.  It’s not unusual in bankruptcy cases for common stockholders to receive $0.   

Points to consider.

There are three major considerations when deciding on how much to invest in stocks. How comfortable you are with market ups and downs, called risk tolerance, how long your money needs to last, called time horizon, and the size of your financial base relative to your financial needs.

Risk tolerance. Investors familiar with the stock market have a better idea of how they’ll react if the market drops. If you have been in the market the past few weeks, you may have decided you want less risk than you have. This market is putting every investor through a risk tolerance test. But if you aren’t sure how much risk you will be comfortable with, you can take a smaller bite of the stock market than would be recommended based on your time horizon. You can always add to that position as you learn through experience.

Time horizon. Too often individuals consider the years up to retirement as their time horizon. Not so. You could be in retirement for 15-30 years. Let’s say you are 45 years old with plans to retire at age 65. You are healthy and expect to live to be 90. Your time horizon is 45 years. The goal is to accumulate enough funds by retirement, the pre-retirement years, that will last throughout retirement, the retirement years. Generally, it is recommended that about five years before retirement the investment in stocks is reduced and bonds and cash are increased. But your money needs to last a long time, and it’s the stock portion of the portfolio that provides growth.

Financial base. The larger the difference between your portfolio size now and where you want it to be at retirement, the larger the allocation to stocks. Stocks are the growth engine of a portfolio. Bonds and cash protect the downside risk and provide income.

Let’s say Madeline wants to have $750,000 in her 401k when she retires in 20 years. She has $50,000 today with plans to add $6,000 per year. To achieve her goal, Madeline needs to earn 11% annually. Stock market returns over the long term have averaged 12%. Therefore, Madeline would need to have a 90 – 100% allocation to stocks to achieve a 11% return.

If Madeline had $100,000 in her 401k, instead of $50,000, she could reduce her allocation to stocks because she only needs an 8% annual return to achieve her goal of $750,000.

Sample Portfolios

Here are some examples of portfolio allocations during different stages of life according to Richard A. Ferri, author of the book All About Asset Allocation.

Mid-life Allocation Range

  Aggressive Moderate Conservative
Equity + REIT  70% 55% 40%
Fixed Income 30% 45% 60%
Cash    0% 0% 0%

 Pre-retiree and Active Retiree Allocation Range

  Aggressive Moderate Conservative
Equity + REIT  60% 50% 35%
Fixed Income 38% 48% 63%
Cash    2% 2% 2%

REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust
Fixed Income = Bonds

Each investor has an allocation that is unique to his or her situation.  The above examples may or may not be appropriate for you. 

A risk of NOT investing a portion of your portfolio in the stock market is that you will outlive your money.

A risk of investing TOO MUCH in the stock market is you will not have time to recover large losses. In addition, fear may cause you to sell in a panic when stocks are at their lowest prices.

Now is the time for rational decisions. “This time is different” is the phrase that pops up each time the stock market takes a precipitous fall. It may or may not be true this time. What we do know is what has occurred in the past. History demonstrates that markets recover and eventually move up.

An exodus to cash will leave you with the daunting decision of when to re-enter the market.  Investors who run to the side-lines often wait too long to buy back in, missing some of the best days’ in the stock market. This is one of the reasons the average investor significantly underperforms the S&P 500. The other reason is that investors chase performance, buying last years’ winners. For most people the best action is no action for now.  You may want to consider making adjustments to your portfolio later, after the market had recovered.

Markets Come Back in April: How Did You Do?

The April comeback after a 1st quarter retreat brought some relief to investors.  Let’s take a look at index returns in the month of April and where the returns are year-to-date as of April 30, 2008.  Remember, Index returns are for illustrative purposes only. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. We rely on index returns as a benchmark to compare our portfolio’s returns. However, even if you bought each security in the index, reinvested all the dividends, and held them the exact length of time as the index return period, you would not be able to achieve those returns because you have to pay transaction costs each time you buy and sell a security.  The index reflects only the dividends and price changes of the securities it holds.

                                                              April 2008                YTD 4/30/2008

U.S. large stocks                                       5.1%                             -4.9% 

U.S. small & mid-sized stocks                 4.2%                              -6.1%

Foreign developed country stocks           5.4%                              -4.0%

Foreign emerging country stocks             8.1%                             -3.8%

U.S. broad bonds                                      -.2%                               2.0%

U.S. municipal bonds                                1.5%                                .3%

We’ll look at the broad equity (stock) and fixed income (bond) markets. 

The U.S. Stock Market:  The Russell 3000 Index represents approximately 99% of the U.S. stock market.  The largest 1,000 stocks make up the Russell 1000 Index.  The next 2,000 stocks make up the Russell 2000 Index.

The Russell 1000 Index, large U.S. companies, achieved a positive total return (dividends plus price change) of 5.1% in April.  That wasn’t enough to erase the losses in the 1st quarter.  Year-to-date April 30 returns still posted a negative 4.9%.     

The Russell 2000 Index, small & mid-sized U.S. companies, posted a return of 4.2% in April with a negative 6.1% return year-to-date.

Foreign stock markets did better than their U.S. counterparts.  The MSCI EAFE Index, representing developed countries, returned 5.4% in April with a negative YTD return of 4.0%.  Countries characterized as emerging economies posted 8.1% return in April but still lost 3.8% YTD.

If you had an allocation to bonds in your portfolio they helped buffer the losses experienced in the U.S. and Foreign stock markets in the 1st quarter.  

Bonds

The Lehman Aggregate Bond Index represents the U.S. investment grade bond market.  It includes U.S. government bonds, corporate bonds, mortgage pass-through securities, and asset-backed securities.  Returns for April were -.2%, achieving a 1.95% return YTD. 

For investors in a higher tax bracket who may have municipal bonds in their portfolio the S&P National Municipal Bond Index posted April returns of 1.5% and YTD returns of .3%. 

2008 has been a challenge to investors.  For those with an allocation between stocks, bonds, and cash that is suited to their risk tolerance and goals, it has been less stressful.  If you have found yourself waking up during the night with your heart palpitating wishing it was morning so you could see how the markets are doing, I suggest you revisit your asset allocation because you could be too heavily invested in stocks. 

If you want me to talk about how to determine an asset allocation that is right for you in a future blog, let me know.  Or, if there is another topic of interest, send a comment to me.

Good investing!

 

 

Investment Management Coach Blog Launch

Hi, I’m Rita Janaky, an investment management coach located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. I work with intelligent women who want to take control of their financial futures. They are typically women who either earned it, inherited it or received it through divorce, and found themselves suddenly facing important investment decisions. I am not a financial planner – I am an investment manager.  And, I consult with people who are looking to buy a business or sell their current business. 

Why do I do this work? Because I enjoy helping women remove stress from their lives by showing them how to make financial decisions that are aligned with their values or beliefs and ultimately helps them meet their goals. Basically, I want them to feel comfortable with the information so they can make more informed choices.

I have been an advisor since 2001.  In February 2004, I started Golden Hills Financial Group, LLC, a Colorado registered investment advisory firm.  This is an independent fee-only advisory firm. 

Portfolios we create for clients can be moved without disrupting the portfolio because the securities we buy are not proprietary.  For instance, if an advisor represents a firm whose securities are sold only through their advisor network, when a client becomes dissatisfied or heirs want to use a different advisor, the assets must either be sold, creating potentially large cap gains tax liabilities or an advisor within that same network must be utilized.    If our clients or their heirs elect to move, their entire portfolio can be transferred to another advisor with no penalty.

We believe that the markets are generally quite efficient.  That means we rely on exchange-traded funds, index funds, and low cost mutual funds when building client portfolios.  These are low-cost, tax efficient securities that keep more of our clients money working for them.

I am a Licensed International Financial Analyst, hold an M.B.A. and a B.S. in Business Administration, emphasizing finance with a minor in economics.  I have taught finance and investments at 2 universities, for the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) Colorado Chapters, as well as public seminars.  

The goal of this blog is to educate.    In particular, to educate women who want to become better investment managers or those women who want to learn more about ’how to sell their business’ or ‘how to buy a new business’.