Investment Management Coach

Entries categorized as ‘investment fees’

Investments – 7 Tips to Move Forward in 2010

December 21, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Investments – 7 Tips to Move Forward in 2010 an Audio Interview

RitaJanaky12-3-09_Pt1  Appoximately 23 minutes.

RitaJanaky12-3-09_Pt2 Approximately 25 minutes

I recently had the privilege to be interviewed by Laura Benjamin, (Laurabenjamin.com) a Colorado communication consultant, business and career coach, and strategic planning facilitator.  The discussion, Part 1 and 2, focused on how we may begin to recover from the two bear markets that have destroyed value in so many portfolios, leaving investors worried about their future. 

Summary

The bear markets of 2000-2002 (stocks lost 33%) and 2008 (stocks lost 37%) have reduced portfolio values in IRAs, 401ks, and personal accounts.  There’s a lot of fear around what to do now, especially for retirees or soon-to-be retirees.  Should they continue to own stocks? Or if they sold, should they get back in?  Maybe they should invest only in bonds and avoid the stock market all together? 

Fortunately the stock market has roared back since its low in March, but we’re still well below the highs of 2007.

I think there are some fundamental decisions to revisit as well as some investing ideas to think about as we move beyond today and plan for tomorrow.

1.  Determine your investment horizon.

 An important question for each person to ask is, “How long do I need my money to last?”  In other words, estimate your life expectancy by considering your current health and the longevity of your parents and grandparents. Don’t make the mistake of thinking only of the years up to your retirement age, because you need your assets to last your life time. 

The Census Bureau currently published life expectancy for men to be 75 years of age and women 80.  If you are 50 with a desire to retire at 65 but you expect to live until your 85, you plan for 35 years.  That’s a long time.  You will likely be more willing and able to take more risk by investing a larger portion of your money in stocks when you’re 50, but even at 65 there is still 20 years left to plan for.    

2.  Be diversified in both stock and bond markets, including those outside of the U.S.

Stocks have performed better than bonds over the long-term.  As one example, we can look at the past 10 years, which included 2 bear (declining) markets, and compare it to the past 20 years.

The short view: $10,000 invested on January 1, 2000 with all dividends and interest reinvested.

On October 31, 2009, almost 10 years later…

100% invested in stocks (S&P 500 index) worth $8,400 (drop in value of 16%)

100% Bond portfolio (Barclay Capital U.S. Aggregate Index) worth $18,500 (increase in value of 85%)

A longer view: $10,000 invested on January 1, 1990

On October 31, 2009, almost 20 years later…

100% in Stocks worth $45,000 (350% increase in value)

100% in Bonds worth $39,000 (290% increase in value)

The idea is that over longer periods of time, stocks have provided greater returns than bonds.  So, if you are investing for ten years or longer, it is reasonable to consider investing some portion of your portfolio in stocks. 

A 50% stock, 50% bond portfolio

A portfolio invested 50% in U.S. stocks and 50% in U.S. bonds, rebalanced each year back to those percentages would have increased from $10,000 on Jan. 1, 1990 to 46,000 on Oct. 31, 2009.  That beat the 100% stock portfolio by $1,000 with a lot less risk.

The closer one gets to retirement and the years in which they will need to withdraw money from their portfolio, the general rule is to reduce the portion invested in stocks and increase the portion invested in bonds and cash. 

3.  Invest in dividend paying stocks and shorter-term bonds.  Returns from dividend paying stocks and interest payments from bonds provide ongoing cash that make up a portion of the total return investors receive.  The dividends and interest provide more certainty than capital gains, which are the changes in security prices.  Securities to consider: utility stocks, preferred stocks, and bonds with short to intermediate duration.

 4.  Consider your other assets when deciding where to invest your money.  For instance, if you own a business you already have exposure to small company risk.  You may want to reduce or eliminate the amount of money you invest in small cap stocks.

Or, if you own commercial real estate or residential income properties, it may be best to avoid buying a fund that increases your exposure to that asset class.

5.  If you are retired be realistic in how much you can spend. 

-         The 4% rule:   Spend 4% of your portfolio each year.  $500,000 portfolio relates to $20,000 available from the portfolio.  If your money is in an IRA or pension plan that is taxed when you withdraw it, then the net amount available with be less than $20,000 after taxes.

-         Spend more when the markets are up; reduce spending when the portfolio is under stress.

6.      Costs do matter.  They reduce returns.  Costs include sales charges such as front-end loads on mutual funds, internal management expenses, and commissions.  The average mutual fund cost is about 1.5% (1 ½ %).  For broad diversification at a low cost, consider index mutual funds or exchange traded funds (ETFs), which are similar to index funds but trade like a stock.  Expenses average .25% (1/4 %) plus ETFs are charged a commission for each trade.  If you know what you want to buy or sell, use a discount broker rather than a full service broker to make your trades.  For more on this topic go to my blog post, How do Investment Advisors and Stockbrokers Get Paid?

7.  If you want to hire an advisor, know what you want that person to do for you.  For example:

If you want someone to create a financial plan, then hire a person who specializes in financial planning. 

If you want investment advice, hire an investment advisor with the appropriate education and experience to manage your money.  You will greatly reduce the risk of being a victim of a scam if  there is a 3rd party custodian, i.e. a company other than your advisor’s firm, that holds your investments and issues statements in addition to those produced by your advisor.

In summary,

-         Invest your money in the U.S. and in foreign markets.  Be diversified, keep costs low, and consider your time horizon to be your life expectancy.

-         Take a realistic view of your current financial situation.  Reduce expenses by deciding what you need versus what would be nice to have.

Categories: asset allocation · bonds · investment fees · investments · life changing events · retirement · risk tolerance
Tagged: ,

Passive Investing: The Choice of More Investors

November 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Passive generally refers to investing in index mutual funds or exchange traded funds rather than active managed mutual funds.  The rivalry between the approaches has raged for years, but evidence is mounting for passive funds.  And investors are listening.

In 1999, $12 billion of exchange traded funds (ETFs) were issued.  Net issuance of ETF shares rose to $177 billion in 2008.  From year end 1998 through 2008 ETFs issued $661 billion in new shares.   The rise in demand came from both institutional and individual investors, according to the Investment Company Fact Book. (www.ici.org

Why the passive approach?

Passive investment vehicles include index mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs).  Both track the performance of a basket of securities included in an index.

For instance, the Russell 3000 Index measures the performance of the broad U.S. equity market.  The Ishares Russell 3000 Fund (IWV) is an exchange traded fund that holds a representative sampling of the securities in the Russell 3000 index.  The sample has an investment profile similar to the index, and may or may not include all of the securities that are included in the index.

As of 10/31/2009 the Russell 3000 index included 2,968 securities.  The Russell 3000 Fund (IWV) held 2,964 of the securities included in the Russell 3000 index. (source:Morningstar)

An index does not invest in the securities, it simply tracks their performance.  Therefore there are no fees included in the index returns. 

Funds, however, invest in the securities and the performance is reduced by transaction costs and other ongoing costs, such as management fees and other fund expenses. The net annual expenses, ongoing costs, for the Russell 3000 Fund are .20% (1/5 of 1%), according to the 2009 annual report.

A fundamental reason investors choose a passive approach is because they are aware that the majority of actively managed mutual funds are not able to out perform their benchmark index over an extended period of time.  The high expenses associated with active management such as transaction and ongoing costs,  reduces the fund’s performance by an average of about 1.5% per year, according to http://www.icifactbook.org/fb_sec5.html

That means if the index posts an 8% return, the average active managed fund would have to achieve a 9.5% return in order to net 8% after costs. If the fund’s returns are less than 9.5%,  it under performs the index. 

Relatively efficient pricing of stocks and bonds along with costs associated with active management makes beating the index a daunting task.  According to a Standard and Poors study, Indices Versus Active Funds Scorecard, Year End 2008, less than 50% of active managers beat their indices over a 5-year period.

An analysis of two – five-year periods of performance; 2004 to 2008 and 1999 to 2003 revealed the following for…

…Large-Cap Active Managed Funds: 72% under performed their S&P 500 index in 2003 to 2008 period, 53 % under performed in 1999 to 2003. 

…Mid-Cap Active Managed Funds: 79% under performed the S&P MidCap 400 benchmark in 2004 to 2008 period, and 91% under performed in 1999 to 2003.

…Small-Cap Active Managed Funds: 86% under performed the S&P SmallCap 600 benchmark in the 2004 to 2008 period, 69% under performed in 1999 to 2003.

According to the study, one consistent investment myth has been that active managers have an advantage in bear markets due to the ability to move quickly into cash or defensive securities.  The study analyzed the performance of active managers during the past two bear markets, 2008 and 2000-2002.   The report illustrated over 50% of the active Large-Cap funds under performed their benchmark, over 70% of the Mid-Cap and Small-Cap funds under performed their respective indices. 

The under performance of active managed international equities and bond funds were similar to U.S.  stock funds. 

To view this study you may have to copy and paste this url  http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPIVA_Rerpot_Year-End_2008 

In conclusion

Exchange Traded Funds and Index Funds offer low cost ownership of both stocks and bonds.  The high cost of active management is one stumbling block that is difficult to overcome for most active managed funds.  Even in bear markets, the majority of active managers fail to beat their benchmark index.

Golden Hills Financial Group is an independent investment advisory firm utilizing exchange traded funds and index funds in portfolio construction.

Categories: asset allocation · fees · investment fees · investments