Investment Management Coach

Entries categorized as ‘investments’

Investments – 7 Tips to Move Forward in 2010

December 21, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Investments – 7 Tips to Move Forward in 2010 an Audio Interview

RitaJanaky12-3-09_Pt1  Appoximately 23 minutes.

RitaJanaky12-3-09_Pt2 Approximately 25 minutes

I recently had the privilege to be interviewed by Laura Benjamin, (Laurabenjamin.com) a Colorado communication consultant, business and career coach, and strategic planning facilitator.  The discussion, Part 1 and 2, focused on how we may begin to recover from the two bear markets that have destroyed value in so many portfolios, leaving investors worried about their future. 

Summary

The bear markets of 2000-2002 (stocks lost 33%) and 2008 (stocks lost 37%) have reduced portfolio values in IRAs, 401ks, and personal accounts.  There’s a lot of fear around what to do now, especially for retirees or soon-to-be retirees.  Should they continue to own stocks? Or if they sold, should they get back in?  Maybe they should invest only in bonds and avoid the stock market all together? 

Fortunately the stock market has roared back since its low in March, but we’re still well below the highs of 2007.

I think there are some fundamental decisions to revisit as well as some investing ideas to think about as we move beyond today and plan for tomorrow.

1.  Determine your investment horizon.

 An important question for each person to ask is, “How long do I need my money to last?”  In other words, estimate your life expectancy by considering your current health and the longevity of your parents and grandparents. Don’t make the mistake of thinking only of the years up to your retirement age, because you need your assets to last your life time. 

The Census Bureau currently published life expectancy for men to be 75 years of age and women 80.  If you are 50 with a desire to retire at 65 but you expect to live until your 85, you plan for 35 years.  That’s a long time.  You will likely be more willing and able to take more risk by investing a larger portion of your money in stocks when you’re 50, but even at 65 there is still 20 years left to plan for.    

2.  Be diversified in both stock and bond markets, including those outside of the U.S.

Stocks have performed better than bonds over the long-term.  As one example, we can look at the past 10 years, which included 2 bear (declining) markets, and compare it to the past 20 years.

The short view: $10,000 invested on January 1, 2000 with all dividends and interest reinvested.

On October 31, 2009, almost 10 years later…

100% invested in stocks (S&P 500 index) worth $8,400 (drop in value of 16%)

100% Bond portfolio (Barclay Capital U.S. Aggregate Index) worth $18,500 (increase in value of 85%)

A longer view: $10,000 invested on January 1, 1990

On October 31, 2009, almost 20 years later…

100% in Stocks worth $45,000 (350% increase in value)

100% in Bonds worth $39,000 (290% increase in value)

The idea is that over longer periods of time, stocks have provided greater returns than bonds.  So, if you are investing for ten years or longer, it is reasonable to consider investing some portion of your portfolio in stocks. 

A 50% stock, 50% bond portfolio

A portfolio invested 50% in U.S. stocks and 50% in U.S. bonds, rebalanced each year back to those percentages would have increased from $10,000 on Jan. 1, 1990 to 46,000 on Oct. 31, 2009.  That beat the 100% stock portfolio by $1,000 with a lot less risk.

The closer one gets to retirement and the years in which they will need to withdraw money from their portfolio, the general rule is to reduce the portion invested in stocks and increase the portion invested in bonds and cash. 

3.  Invest in dividend paying stocks and shorter-term bonds.  Returns from dividend paying stocks and interest payments from bonds provide ongoing cash that make up a portion of the total return investors receive.  The dividends and interest provide more certainty than capital gains, which are the changes in security prices.  Securities to consider: utility stocks, preferred stocks, and bonds with short to intermediate duration.

 4.  Consider your other assets when deciding where to invest your money.  For instance, if you own a business you already have exposure to small company risk.  You may want to reduce or eliminate the amount of money you invest in small cap stocks.

Or, if you own commercial real estate or residential income properties, it may be best to avoid buying a fund that increases your exposure to that asset class.

5.  If you are retired be realistic in how much you can spend. 

-         The 4% rule:   Spend 4% of your portfolio each year.  $500,000 portfolio relates to $20,000 available from the portfolio.  If your money is in an IRA or pension plan that is taxed when you withdraw it, then the net amount available with be less than $20,000 after taxes.

-         Spend more when the markets are up; reduce spending when the portfolio is under stress.

6.      Costs do matter.  They reduce returns.  Costs include sales charges such as front-end loads on mutual funds, internal management expenses, and commissions.  The average mutual fund cost is about 1.5% (1 ½ %).  For broad diversification at a low cost, consider index mutual funds or exchange traded funds (ETFs), which are similar to index funds but trade like a stock.  Expenses average .25% (1/4 %) plus ETFs are charged a commission for each trade.  If you know what you want to buy or sell, use a discount broker rather than a full service broker to make your trades.  For more on this topic go to my blog post, How do Investment Advisors and Stockbrokers Get Paid?

7.  If you want to hire an advisor, know what you want that person to do for you.  For example:

If you want someone to create a financial plan, then hire a person who specializes in financial planning. 

If you want investment advice, hire an investment advisor with the appropriate education and experience to manage your money.  You will greatly reduce the risk of being a victim of a scam if  there is a 3rd party custodian, i.e. a company other than your advisor’s firm, that holds your investments and issues statements in addition to those produced by your advisor.

In summary,

-         Invest your money in the U.S. and in foreign markets.  Be diversified, keep costs low, and consider your time horizon to be your life expectancy.

-         Take a realistic view of your current financial situation.  Reduce expenses by deciding what you need versus what would be nice to have.

Categories: asset allocation · bonds · investment fees · investments · life changing events · retirement · risk tolerance
Tagged: ,

Passive Investing: The Choice of More Investors

November 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Passive generally refers to investing in index mutual funds or exchange traded funds rather than active managed mutual funds.  The rivalry between the approaches has raged for years, but evidence is mounting for passive funds.  And investors are listening.

In 1999, $12 billion of exchange traded funds (ETFs) were issued.  Net issuance of ETF shares rose to $177 billion in 2008.  From year end 1998 through 2008 ETFs issued $661 billion in new shares.   The rise in demand came from both institutional and individual investors, according to the Investment Company Fact Book. (www.ici.org) 

Why the passive approach?

Passive investment vehicles include index mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs).  Both track the performance of a basket of securities included in an index.

For instance, the Russell 3000 Index measures the performance of the broad U.S. equity market.  The Ishares Russell 3000 Fund (IWV) is an exchange traded fund that holds a representative sampling of the securities in the Russell 3000 index.  The sample has an investment profile similar to the index, and may or may not include all of the securities that are included in the index.

As of 10/31/2009 the Russell 3000 index included 2,968 securities.  The Russell 3000 Fund (IWV) held 2,964 of the securities included in the Russell 3000 index. (source:Morningstar)

An index does not invest in the securities, it simply tracks their performance.  Therefore there are no fees included in the index returns. 

Funds, however, invest in the securities and the performance is reduced by transaction costs and other ongoing costs, such as management fees and other fund expenses. The net annual expenses, ongoing costs, for the Russell 3000 Fund are .20% (1/5 of 1%), according to the 2009 annual report.

A fundamental reason investors choose a passive approach is because they are aware that the majority of actively managed mutual funds are not able to out perform their benchmark index over an extended period of time.  The high expenses associated with active management such as transaction and ongoing costs,  reduces the fund’s performance by an average of about 1.5% per year, according to http://www.icifactbook.org/fb_sec5.html

That means if the index posts an 8% return, the average active managed fund would have to achieve a 9.5% return in order to net 8% after costs. If the fund’s returns are less than 9.5%,  it under performs the index. 

Relatively efficient pricing of stocks and bonds along with costs associated with active management makes beating the index a daunting task.  According to a Standard and Poors study, Indices Versus Active Funds Scorecard, Year End 2008, less than 50% of active managers beat their indices over a 5-year period.

An analysis of two – five-year periods of performance; 2004 to 2008 and 1999 to 2003 revealed the following for…

…Large-Cap Active Managed Funds: 72% under performed their S&P 500 index in 2003 to 2008 period, 53 % under performed in 1999 to 2003. 

…Mid-Cap Active Managed Funds: 79% under performed the S&P MidCap 400 benchmark in 2004 to 2008 period, and 91% under performed in 1999 to 2003.

…Small-Cap Active Managed Funds: 86% under performed the S&P SmallCap 600 benchmark in the 2004 to 2008 period, 69% under performed in 1999 to 2003.

According to the study, one consistent investment myth has been that active managers have an advantage in bear markets due to the ability to move quickly into cash or defensive securities.  The study analyzed the performance of active managers during the past two bear markets, 2008 and 2000-2002.   The report illustrated over 50% of the active Large-Cap funds under performed their benchmark, over 70% of the Mid-Cap and Small-Cap funds under performed their respective indices. 

The under performance of active managed international equities and bond funds were similar to U.S.  stock funds. 

To view this study you may have to copy and paste this url  http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPIVA_Rerpot_Year-End_2008 

In conclusion

Exchange Traded Funds and Index Funds offer low cost ownership of both stocks and bonds.  The high cost of active management is one stumbling block that is difficult to overcome for most active managed funds.  Even in bear markets, the majority of active managers fail to beat their benchmark index.

Golden Hills Financial Group is an independent investment advisory firm utilizing exchange traded funds and index funds in portfolio construction.

Categories: asset allocation · fees · investment fees · investments

Wisdom Comes From Experience; Stock Market Lessons in 2009

October 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

It’s been a tough year for investors in the stock market.  The good news is that U.S. stocks have gained 60% since the market lows of early March, recovering many of the losses from prior months. 

If you held stocks outside the U.S., in particular those of emerging markets like Brazil, Russia, and India, your portfolio would have received an extra shot of positive returns.  The emerging markets index returned more than 60% as of Sept. 30 compared to 19% for the S&P 500. 

The rapid fall of stock markets, followed by the big bounce off the bottom, offers three lessons: 

1. Know the level of risk you can tolerate for the long haul, and allocate a reasonable portion of your portfolio to risky stocks.

Stocks do not rise indefinitely.  Bull markets end, sometimes spiraling downward in a rapid decline.    Investors over-allocated to stocks who bailed out the end of 2008 aren’t likely to recover their losses for a long time.

2. Rebalance to established weights of stocks and bonds, (real estate and other asset classes, too) on an as-needed basis to avoid ‘stock creep’; an increase in the allocation to stocks that is greater than your intended amount.

It’s almost impossible, if not completely impossible, to know with certainty when the markets are going to change direction.  It may be true that when a bull market is underway rebalancing reduces the portfolio’s return, but if stocks make a quick about turn, a rebalanced portfolio will experience less value destruction.

3. Diversifying a portfolio reduces volatility.  U.S. and foreign stocks and bonds combine to offer downside protection.  Generally when one asset class zigs, the other zags. 

During the 4th quarter of 2008, the S&P 500 lost over 20%.  The U.S. bond market was up over 5%.  A $100,000 stock portfolio would have lost $20,000.  A portfolio with 60% allocated to stocks and 40% to bonds would have declined by $10,000.  But that’s not the end of the story.  The return needed to build the portfolio from $80,000 to $100,000 is 25% while the 60/40 portfolio needs only to gain 11% to be made whole.

2009 Index Returns

Index Sep-09 QTD YTD Description
DJIA

2.43%

15.82%

13.49%

 Large-cap stocks
S&P 500

3.73%

15.61%

19.26%

 Large-cap stocks
Russell 1000 Growth

4.25%

13.97%

27.11%

 Large-cap growth stocks
Russell 1000 Value

3.86%

18.24%

14.85%

 Large-cap value stocks
Russell 2000 Growth

6.57%

15.95%

29.12%

 Small-cap growth stocks
Russell 2000 Value

5.02%

22.70%

16.36%

 Small-cap value stocks
MSCI EAFE

3.83%

19.47%

28.97%

 Developed market stocks
MSCI EM

9.08%

20.91%

64.45%

 Emerging market stocks
BarCap Aggregate Bond

1.05%

3.74%

5.72%

 U.S. corp./govt bonds
3-mos T-Bills

0.01%

0.04%

0.15%

 Cash

Categories: asset allocation · bonds · investments · life changing events · risk tolerance

How to Hang Tough in a Tough Market

October 9, 2008 · 4 Comments

These are tough times to be an investor. The stock market’s long-term return of 11-13% fades in relevance as the value of your portfolio declines. Investors begin to doubt their decision to invest in this wild, volatile, crazy, anxiety-creating market. I’m not writing this article to say you shouldn’t feel that way. I’m writing to suggest you grasp the lessons an ugly market teaches us, and evaluate whether you have the correct plan for your portfolio.

Striking the Right Balance

The most important decision an investor makes is the allocation of their money between stocks, bonds, and cash. Some research has shown that 90% of your long-term return comes from this asset allocation decision. Many, maybe most, people jump right into buying stocks and mutual funds before they have crafted their stock/bond/cash strategy. They end up with too much in the stock market, making them susceptible to larger losses than they can tolerate.

The stock market over the long term has provided higher returns than bonds because investors demand a premium for accepting the higher risk in stocks.  Why do stocks pose more risk to investors? The brief answer is when you buy shares of a company, you become part-owner in the firm. There are no guarantees of dividends or that you will ever get your money back. If you buy a bond issued by the government or a corporation, you become a creditor. You have lent them money. They in turn will pay you interest over the life of the bond. Upon maturity you get your principal back. Regular payments and your money back. Not much risk in that. Oh, if a company you lent money to goes broke, you get paid before stockholders get a dime. Common stockholders get paid if there’s any money left after bond holders and preferred stock holders are satisfied.  It’s not unusual in bankruptcy cases for common stockholders to receive $0.   

Points to consider.

There are three major considerations when deciding on how much to invest in stocks. How comfortable you are with market ups and downs, called risk tolerance, how long your money needs to last, called time horizon, and the size of your financial base relative to your financial needs.

Risk tolerance. Investors familiar with the stock market have a better idea of how they’ll react if the market drops. If you have been in the market the past few weeks, you may have decided you want less risk than you have. This market is putting every investor through a risk tolerance test. But if you aren’t sure how much risk you will be comfortable with, you can take a smaller bite of the stock market than would be recommended based on your time horizon. You can always add to that position as you learn through experience.

Time horizon. Too often individuals consider the years up to retirement as their time horizon. Not so. You could be in retirement for 15-30 years. Let’s say you are 45 years old with plans to retire at age 65. You are healthy and expect to live to be 90. Your time horizon is 45 years. The goal is to accumulate enough funds by retirement, the pre-retirement years, that will last throughout retirement, the retirement years. Generally, it is recommended that about five years before retirement the investment in stocks is reduced and bonds and cash are increased. But your money needs to last a long time, and it’s the stock portion of the portfolio that provides growth.

Financial base. The larger the difference between your portfolio size now and where you want it to be at retirement, the larger the allocation to stocks. Stocks are the growth engine of a portfolio. Bonds and cash protect the downside risk and provide income.

Let’s say Madeline wants to have $750,000 in her 401k when she retires in 20 years. She has $50,000 today with plans to add $6,000 per year. To achieve her goal, Madeline needs to earn 11% annually. Stock market returns over the long term have averaged 12%. Therefore, Madeline would need to have a 90 – 100% allocation to stocks to achieve a 11% return.

If Madeline had $100,000 in her 401k, instead of $50,000, she could reduce her allocation to stocks because she only needs an 8% annual return to achieve her goal of $750,000.

Sample Portfolios

Here are some examples of portfolio allocations during different stages of life according to Richard A. Ferri, author of the book All About Asset Allocation.

Mid-life Allocation Range

  Aggressive Moderate Conservative
Equity + REIT  70% 55% 40%
Fixed Income 30% 45% 60%
Cash    0% 0% 0%

 Pre-retiree and Active Retiree Allocation Range

  Aggressive Moderate Conservative
Equity + REIT  60% 50% 35%
Fixed Income 38% 48% 63%
Cash    2% 2% 2%

REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust
Fixed Income = Bonds

Each investor has an allocation that is unique to his or her situation.  The above examples may or may not be appropriate for you. 

A risk of NOT investing a portion of your portfolio in the stock market is that you will outlive your money.

A risk of investing TOO MUCH in the stock market is you will not have time to recover large losses. In addition, fear may cause you to sell in a panic when stocks are at their lowest prices.

Now is the time for rational decisions. “This time is different” is the phrase that pops up each time the stock market takes a precipitous fall. It may or may not be true this time. What we do know is what has occurred in the past. History demonstrates that markets recover and eventually move up.

An exodus to cash will leave you with the daunting decision of when to re-enter the market.  Investors who run to the side-lines often wait too long to buy back in, missing some of the best days’ in the stock market. This is one of the reasons the average investor significantly underperforms the S&P 500. The other reason is that investors chase performance, buying last years’ winners. For most people the best action is no action for now.  You may want to consider making adjustments to your portfolio later, after the market had recovered.

Categories: asset allocation · investments · life changing events · retirement · risk tolerance

Investment Classes Being Offered

July 24, 2008 · Leave a Comment

If you live in Colorado Springs, CO check out the classes I will be offering on August 6 and 13.  It’s been almost impossible to find an objective, informative, interactive class where you can learn how to manage your investments.  Well, now you can.  I’ve offered this class about once a year, so if you’re interested don’t procrastinate.   Sign up and come have some fun.  Really!  Here is a description of the two classes, Investing-Basics and Investing-Intermediate.  You can take one or both. 

______________________________________________________

Does investing intimidate you?    Well, it doesn’t have to. 

Come join me to gain knowledge and confidence in making money management decisions.

If you wonder if you have too much in the stock market, are being too conservative, or are just perplexed at how to invest your 401(k), IRA, or other investments, please read on! These just might be the perfect classes for you!

Course Title: Investing – Basic.  This course provides the foundation for you to create an investment portfolio designed to meet your personal financial goals. 

What will I learn?

  • How to create an investment portfolio that lets you sleep at night.
  • The right mix of stocks, bonds, and cash based on your personal risk assessment and the rate of return needed to reach your financial goals. 
  • What diversification means and why it’s important to your portfolio.
  • The difference between a mutual fund, index fund, and exchange traded fund.
  • Investment terminology.
  • Sources of investment information.

Course Title: Investing – Intermediate. This course expands on the topics covered in Investing – Basic.  You will learn more advanced concepts and tools to manage your investments.

Both classed are designed to help you be a better money manager.  They are for anyone who wants better-than-average investment returns. 

Instructor:  Rita Janaky, CEO   (Click on my name to read my biography)

REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Location:  1115  Elkton Drive, Suite 300, 80907 (from I25 west on Garden of the Gods Road.  Right on Elkton Drive to Key Business Center.  Elevator to 3rd floor.)

Times:  Investing – Basic: Wednesday, August 6, 5:30-8:30 p.m.
             Investing – Intermediate: Wednesday, August 13, 5:30 – 8:30 p.m.

Fees:  Each class: $65 per person–Bring a Buddy and save 25%!  $49 per person
          Both classes: $110 per person–Bring a Buddy and save 25%! $83 per person
Included: hands-on in-class assignment, handouts, resources, refreshments and snacks.

Registration deadline: Friday, August 1.  Call 719.260.8000 or email rita@goldenhillsgroup.com.  Checks made payable to Golden Hills Financial Group, 1115 Elkton Drive, Suite 300, Colorado Springs 80907

100% money back guarantee! 

Comments from past participants.

“For the first time I feel like I understand enough about the basics to make more informed decisions about where I put my money.  I’m much less intimidated by the basics of investing than I was 2 weeks ago.  Thanks!” Karen Siebring, Human Resources Director, Colorado Springs, Co

“… helped me to understand general ideas so I can move on and manage my own portfolio.  Like the explanations of each item discussed.”  Tracie Lain, Accounting Assistant, Colorado Springs, CO

Come join me for an active learning experience!

Categories: asset allocation · education · fees · investments · retirement · risk tolerance

Three Reasons to Include Bonds In Your Retirement Portfolio

June 30, 2008 · Leave a Comment

1) Bonds reduce portfolio risk by reducing volatility.

Creating a portfolio is like putting the pieces of a puzzle together.  Portfolios are built by assembling pieces of stocks, bonds, and cash, with possible additions of real estate, commodities, & alternative investments.  Modern portfolio theory taught us that by combining securities that don’t follow each other, when one leans left the other right, we are likely to achieve a more stable return.  Bonds tend not to move in tandem with stocks.  In finance terms, they have a low correlation to stocks.  So if stocks drop 15%, bonds may decline but less than 15% or they may even rise.  Bonds are the pieces that reduce short-term, gut wrenching swings in the portfolio’s value. 

A recent example.  From October, 2007 to March, 2008, the S&P 500 had lost around 16%.  The Lehman Aggregate Bond Fund, used to represent the broad U.S. bond market, was up about 4%. A portfolio split 50/50 between the S&P 500 & the Lehman Bond Fund, would have returned -6%.  

2) Bonds protect the downside.

While similar to #1, protecting the portfolio’s value is of special importance to retirees who are withdrawing funds regularly to supplement their income.  When cash is withdrawn from a 100% stock portfolio during down markets, the distribution takes a larger piece of the portfolio than if the markets were up, and that piece is gone so it can’t come back when the markets climb.  

For simplicity let’s consider a portfolio made up 2,000 shares of an exchange traded fund, IWV, that represents the U.S. stock market.  The price per share has plummeted to $78.  Each month the retiree withdraws $1,000 for living expenses.  13 shares are sold at $78 to provide this month’s withdrawal.  Next month IWV has risen to $95 per share.  Only 11 shares have to be liquidated in order to withdraw $1,000.  The two additional shares that had to be sold at $78 are no longer in the portfolio and able to come back with the market.

In a declining stock market, cash and bonds can provide the income needed.  When the stock market comes back, (yes it will rise again) the stock portfolio will not have been depleted so will take full advantage of the rising prices.

3) Bonds provide income.

Bonds pay interest, which makes up most of their return.  The other portion of the return comes from the change in the price.  Individual bonds typically make interest payments every 6 months.  Bond funds generally distribute interest monthly.  The interest payments provide stability to a portfolio, and dependable cash distributions to investors.  When the markets are performing poorly, during a bear market, interest payments are a stable source of income.

If you rely on distributions from your investments to supplement income.  If you do not have other income streams to use when the stock market is declining.  If your financial position is such that you are concerned you may outlive your money.  Then investing a portion of your portfolio in bonds is wise.

The portion you allocate to bonds could vary from 15% for the aggressive investor with a time horizon over 20 years, to 85% for an investor more concerned with preserving their portfolio and has a life expectancy less than 5 years.

 

 

 

Categories: asset allocation · bonds · investments · retirement

3 Tips to Keep From Running Out of Money In Retirement.

June 6, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Your vision is of a white sand beach, you’re in a lounge chair sipping an exotic drink, watching the waves slowly roll in as swimmers frolic in the aqua clear waters. Then you wake up.  You immediately remember you fell asleep struggling with feelings of euphoria and panic as you begin the next phase of your life called RETIREMENT. 

We all want to enjoy our retirement years with as much vigor and as little stress as we can muster. While I can’t help much with the vigor, a few financial tips on how to live in retirement may help to reduce the stress.

Tip #1: Invest wisely.   Allocate your investment portfolio across stocks, bonds, cash in proportions that reflect both your tolerance for risk and your financial position. For instance, you may have a very low tolerance for taking risk with your money. Based on that alone, you might be comfortable with a very small or no portion of your retirement money in the stock market. Now review your financial position. Based on your current spending habits, you plan to spend, or are currently spending, 8% of your portfolio annually. That mean in order to maintain the principle balance your portfolio needs to earn 8% + some inflation factor of let’s say 3% per year, or 11% annual rate of return. That won’t happen invested in cash and bonds.  Over the long term cash has returned about 3%, bonds 5%, and stocks 10%. In the short term, returns vary dramatically from year-to-year, putting stress on you and your finances during retirement. So what do you do? You might start by reducing your spending habits. But that’s not my point in Tip #1. Find the right balance in allocating your money between stocks, bonds, and cash so the volatility in your stock investments will be offset by the more conservative and stable investments in bonds and cash. Stocks add a long-term growth element to the portfolio which is needed to increase the probability your money will live has long as you do. The following are some sample retiree portfolio allocations to consider:

Preservation Portfolio: This is probably best for retirees who stay awake at night worrying about losing money. It’s more appropriate for people with a shorter time horizons–say less than 10 years. By “time horizon” I mean life expectancy.
15% Stock
60% Bond
25% Cash

Conservative Portfolio: If you expect to live at least 10 years and you don’t like taking a lot of risk.
30% Stock
55% Bond
15% Cash

Moderate Portfolio: Retirees who expect to live more than 10 years and have an appetite for some risk, may want to consider a larger allocation to stocks.

60% Stock
35% Bond
5% Cash

Aggressive Portfolio: Do you expect to live 20 years or more? Is your spending flexible enough that you could reduce expenses during down markets? Do you have another source of income, such as a pension, that you can rely upon if the markets are negative for two or more years? If so, you may be a candidate for the Aggressive Portfolio.
75% Stock
20% Bond
5% Cash

Even the most aggressive portfolio does not have 100% stock. Some retirees may have a level of wealth that no matter how they invest they will never run out of money, think Bill Gates. Most retirees should not be risking their entire nest egg in the stock market. You will also notice that the portfolio with the least risk includes some stock. That is to maintain some potential for growth. There is uncertainty in knowing how long we will live. Even a preservation portfolio may need to last longer than we initially thought. You want living longer to be considered a good thing.

Tip #2: Minimize your fixed costs.
Flexible spending during your retirement years will put you in control. If you have the control to reduce expenses and draw less from your portfolio when the stock market is doing poorly, then your dollars will last longer. Wait until the markets have plumped up your funds with good returns before buying those cruise tickets. For many, the mortgage is their largest monthly fixed cost. Focus on paying it off.  Or downsize to a smaller, less expensive house.  If there’s equity left over, invest it.  Pay off your credit card debt.   

Tip #3: Don’t retire….. recreate your life.
For many retirees working after retirement will not be a choice.  It will be necessary.  Living in retirement for maybe 20-40 years is a very long time.   If there’s a pretty good possibility you may outlive your finances, take a year or so to live the retirees dream, then create your next life phase.  This could be your opportunity to do something you are good at but couldn’t make enough money from it to support yourself and your family.  Now the financial need isn’t as great, so go for it.  Take Dick and Nancy.  Dick taught painting before he retired and Nancy worked in art museums.  In their 70s now, they live 6 months in Italy where Dick paints the landscape and sells his art work to tourists.  Nancy authors books on artists and writes travel guides of Italy that include Dick’s art work.  How about Steve, a man who can fix anything.  He has fun socializing a few hours each week at a hardware store where he helps make home and landscape projects less daunting for those with lesser experience.  The extra cash, social enjoyment, and mental activity keep him young so he can continue to enjoy four days a week at a lake home with family and friends.

Recreate a life that makes you happy! 

 

Categories: investments · life changing events · retirement

Markets Come Back in April: How Did You Do?

May 7, 2008 · Leave a Comment

The April comeback after a 1st quarter retreat brought some relief to investors.  Let’s take a look at index returns in the month of April and where the returns are year-to-date as of April 30, 2008.  Remember, Index returns are for illustrative purposes only. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. We rely on index returns as a benchmark to compare our portfolio’s returns. However, even if you bought each security in the index, reinvested all the dividends, and held them the exact length of time as the index return period, you would not be able to achieve those returns because you have to pay transaction costs each time you buy and sell a security.  The index reflects only the dividends and price changes of the securities it holds.

                                                              April 2008                YTD 4/30/2008

U.S. large stocks                                       5.1%                             -4.9% 

U.S. small & mid-sized stocks                 4.2%                              -6.1%

Foreign developed country stocks           5.4%                              -4.0%

Foreign emerging country stocks             8.1%                             -3.8%

U.S. broad bonds                                      -.2%                               2.0%

U.S. municipal bonds                                1.5%                                .3%

We’ll look at the broad equity (stock) and fixed income (bond) markets. 

The U.S. Stock Market:  The Russell 3000 Index represents approximately 99% of the U.S. stock market.  The largest 1,000 stocks make up the Russell 1000 Index.  The next 2,000 stocks make up the Russell 2000 Index.

The Russell 1000 Index, large U.S. companies, achieved a positive total return (dividends plus price change) of 5.1% in April.  That wasn’t enough to erase the losses in the 1st quarter.  Year-to-date April 30 returns still posted a negative 4.9%.     

The Russell 2000 Index, small & mid-sized U.S. companies, posted a return of 4.2% in April with a negative 6.1% return year-to-date.

Foreign stock markets did better than their U.S. counterparts.  The MSCI EAFE Index, representing developed countries, returned 5.4% in April with a negative YTD return of 4.0%.  Countries characterized as emerging economies posted 8.1% return in April but still lost 3.8% YTD.

If you had an allocation to bonds in your portfolio they helped buffer the losses experienced in the U.S. and Foreign stock markets in the 1st quarter.  

Bonds

The Lehman Aggregate Bond Index represents the U.S. investment grade bond market.  It includes U.S. government bonds, corporate bonds, mortgage pass-through securities, and asset-backed securities.  Returns for April were -.2%, achieving a 1.95% return YTD. 

For investors in a higher tax bracket who may have municipal bonds in their portfolio the S&P National Municipal Bond Index posted April returns of 1.5% and YTD returns of .3%. 

2008 has been a challenge to investors.  For those with an allocation between stocks, bonds, and cash that is suited to their risk tolerance and goals, it has been less stressful.  If you have found yourself waking up during the night with your heart palpitating wishing it was morning so you could see how the markets are doing, I suggest you revisit your asset allocation because you could be too heavily invested in stocks. 

If you want me to talk about how to determine an asset allocation that is right for you in a future blog, let me know.  Or, if there is another topic of interest, send a comment to me.

Good investing!

 

 

Categories: asset allocation · investments · risk tolerance
Tagged: , ,

Selling Your Business – Getting the Best Price for Your Largest Investment

April 22, 2008 · 2 Comments

When should you think about selling your business?  The best answer is, when you become the owner.  At the earliest stage, consider an exit strategy.  Selling is one way to exit your business.  Other exit strategies can be to take the business public in an initial public offering (IPO) or pass it on to family members with a succession plan. 

If you plan to sell your business, then understanding what creates value will help you focus on value-creating aspects of the company.   Buyers look at the history of a business as support for today’s value.  Wouldn’t you rather buy a business with revenue and profits trending upward?  That means timing of the sale will be important to you.  If your interest is waning, the industry is stagnating, competitors are multiplying, your health is declining, you may find sooner rather than later will bring in the best offer.  Managing the business with an eye to its sale, will allow you to pick the best time to sell.   

An experienced, serious buyer will spend considerable time on due-diligence.  That is the process of scrutinizing your markets & marketing strategy, financial operations, property & equipment, and business operations & personnel.  Your preparation will reduce a buyer’s concerns and increase their willingness to make an offer. 

Manage the following aspects for creating value.

Maintain excellent records.  Lowering the buyer’s risk will increase what they are willing to pay.  Help the buyer feel confident that what they see is what they’ll get.  Keep good documentation for inventory control, payroll, financial statements and other key business processes. 

Buyer’s thinking:  A buyer has to continue to run the business when you are gone.  Having up-to-date written processes means the transition will go smooth even if some employees leave after the sale. 

Have a clean balance sheet.  Write-off or negotiate payment of old accounts receivable items.   Take care of the accounts payable items that have been on the books because of disagreements.  Focus on paying down debt, cleaning up the inventory, and minimizing liabilities. 

Buyer’s thinking:  Old receivables show an unwillingness for customers to pay.  A buyer will think there are unsatisfied customers.  Then the question is raised as to the quality of the product and service, the level of customer service provided,  and the overall customer experience and attitude. 

Focus on profit.  The concept is simple… increase revenue, reduce expenses, increase profits.  At least it’s simply stated.  To get the highest dollar for your business will require you to manage the income statement.   Are there opportunities to increase sales that have been overlooked or put on hold because you’ve concentrated on serving the current customers?   Have you reviewed contracts on real estate, property insurance, employee benefits, and so on to see if you can get the same or better service for a lower price.  Does the company lease vehicles?  Can you cut your lease expense?  If your income statement reflects accelerated depreciation, which is used to reduce profits and lower the tax liability, a different method for income statement purposes may reduce this expense, increasing the bottom line.  These are some general ideas for you to consider.  

Buyer’s thinking:  A  trend of increasing revenue and profitability shows that current management and processes are performing well.  The buyer can focus on growth with the expectation the current profits will be maintained after the purchase.   

Be sure the facilities, machinery & equipment are in good general condition.  Curb appeal is important.  Present a clean, organized facility.  Have the furniture & fixtures, vehicles, machinery & equipment in good condition.  

Buyer’s thinking:  If the seller maintains the property and equipment, then there is reason to think other parts of the business are well managed.  The buyer may be using these assets to collateralize the loan to finance the purchase.  The better the condition of the assets the more value the banker will assign to them resulting in a larger loan.

Have the right personnel.  A good management team and employees with the right skills need to be in place. 

Buyer’s thinking:  Adequate personnel keeps business disruption to a minimum during and following the transition.  A buyer can be more confident that sales will be maintained and impact on cash flow will be minimal.

Get a valuation analysis: It’s difficult to value your own business.   The personal attachment after years of hard work and personal sacrifice tend to inflate the value to a seller.  An ouside expert can give you a range of value developed from sound valuation practice and experience.  

Getting the highest price for your business may take 3 to 7 years of preparation.   The payback comes when you get the best price possible for the firm.  And, knowing the business you have worked so hard to create will continue into the future serving your customers and providing jobs for your employees. 

 

Categories: investments · life changing events · mergers and acquisitions · selling a business
Tagged: , , , , ,

Selling Your Business – Showcase Your Value

April 21, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Profitability is important in valuing your business.  But that’s not the only position of value to consider as you think about selling. 

You may hear that if your company isn’t profitable you have nothing to sell.  Not always true.  In 1993 I sold a management training firm that I had started three years earlier.  The company was just building name recognition and had achieved marginal profitability when my husband’s multiple sclerosis forced him into early retirement at 44 years old.  We decided the best option for the family was for me to sell the business and take a corporate position that would provide more security (health insurance) with less risk for the family. 

It was a traumatic time.  I gained weight as I ate my way through hours of ‘coming to grips’ with the decision.  The business was serving the needs of the business community.  Three years of hard work were starting to provide the payback I had worked so hard to achieve.  Now, I was thinking of closing the doors.  That was the advice of a CPA who said the firm wasn’t profitable enough to get an interested buyer.

At first I took that advice as gospel.  Then I started thinking about the companies we had been serving and thought someone must see the gains we had made over the three years, with companies returning to buy additional services. 

I decided to build a history of the firm, showing profit and loss statements with a trend of increasing revenue.  Following that, I built a spreadsheet that listed each customer.   After each company I included the invoices, dates, and dollars spent with us to show repeat business from satisfied customers. 

It’s interesting, as the owner I knew this was taking place but I had never compiled the data in this way before.  Now I had a positive financial trend with repeat customers to share with potential buyers.  It was starting to look like we had something to sell. 

I didn’t stop there.  In the files we had kept notes from customers.  Some had written comments of appreciation on the surveys that were sent with each product or service. Some were unsolicted notes from individuals we had worked with who just wanted to say ‘thank you’ for helping them find the best training book, video, or speaker to fit their training need.

The final step was gathering marketing pieces we had developed, newsletters, magazine articles written about us, and training material we helped companies to create.  Contracts with trainers & suppliers were added to round out all of the important business documents. 

A three-ring binder was put together, creating an impressive picture of what we had to offer a buyer.

At that point I started making phone calls to companies that might be interested in buying the firm.  Within six weeks I had three interested parties.  One of which were the owners of a chain of grocery stores.  They bought the firm.  A rather unusual buyer you are probably thinking.  They had two reasons.  They wanted to increase the employee training within their stores and owning the firm would make that more cost effective.  The other reason was that one of the owners wanted to create and sell her own workshops, something we outsourced to professional speakers and trainers. 

The company I sold was called An Open Mind Company and I recommend you keep an open mind when you plan for the sale of your firm. 

 

Categories: investments · life changing events · mergers and acquisitions · selling a business
Tagged: